From patient information
to a structured visit review.

A description of the scenes and key changes on screen. The film contains no audio; narrative captions are included in the picture.

1. The patient’s information

   Companion shows synthetic case V2-CONSULT-01. A patient has prepared information about hand pain, morning stiffness and their effect on everyday activities.

2. A summary for review

   A user action transfers the material from Companion to Clinic Assistant within one local demonstration session. The clinician receives a summary of the same case and can check the source of an entry.

3. A visible gap

   The original entry reads, “I mainly notice stiffness in the morning. I have not recorded how long it lasts.” The clinician can see that the duration is missing. Missing information is not treated as a negative answer.

4. The clinician’s question

   The clinician opens the available question. Companion shows: “How long does morning stiffness in your hands last after waking?” The film switches from the clinician’s perspective to the patient’s.

5. The prepared reply

   The patient applies the prepared reply: “About 45 minutes after waking.” A user action then transfers the update back to Clinic Assistant.

6. An updated summary with the original preserved

   The clinician’s view now includes the 45-minute duration and its source. The original description and previous version remain available. The reply adds context without replacing the patient’s entry.

7. Review, draft and TXT export

   The clinician records a review of the consultation purpose, saves a local draft and downloads the material as TXT. The film shows part of the downloaded file. Reviewing one field does not approve the entire medical record. Decisions stay with the clinician; this is a prototype using synthetic data, not for clinical use.